Jan Kumstat vs Vladyslav Orlov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Over the past six months, Orlov slightly edges out Kumstat in second serve performance, winning 43.51% of points compared to Kumstat's 40.77%. Could this give Orlov a slight advantage in maintaining service games?
• Their return game stats are comparably close, with Orlov again leading slightly by winning 47.1% against Kumstat’s 46.58% on opponent’s second serves. On first serve returns, Orlov also leads with a win rate of 29.4% compared to Kumstat’s 28.48%.
• Both players are almost identical under pressure, with Kumstat saving 51.54% of breakpoints and Orlov 51.44%. How much does this affect the outcome when facing breakpoints?
• In the last year, Orlov has won more matches overall (48.53%) compared to Kumstat’s 41.18%. Does this higher win percentage suggest greater match competitiveness?
• Kumstat’s best career surface is Indoor Hard, with a win rate of 60%, while Orlov’s preferred surface is Hard, securing 57% of wins. Do these surface preferences play a major role in this matchup?
• Both have primarily played in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, but Orlov shows a stronger record with a 51.16% win rate compared to Kumstat’s 36.36%.
• Kumstat faces opponents with a higher average ranking (303.88) compared to Orlov’s 422.71, indicating Kumstat may compete against tougher challengers.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Kumstat holds a clear advantage, winning 67% of such sets, while Orlov has a 35% success rate. Could this withstand the deciding moments of a close match?
• For break point conversion rates, Orlov again takes a slight lead with 34.31% efficiency as opposed to Kumstat’s 30.93%.

Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performances and statistical patterns, both Kumstat and Orlov show strengths in specific areas with subtle differences.

Orlov holds an edge in service games, return performance, and overall match win rate in the past year. This suggests a general consistency and competency in Orlov’s gameplay.

Kumstat, however, indicates resilience in deciding sets, signaling stronger performance under high pressure. This may indeed be critical if the match extends to a final set.

The surface preference and strength of opposition faced also play crucial roles. Kumstat plays against higher-ranked adversaries on average, which might have prepared them for tougher conditions.

Given the data, Orlov appears slightly favored to win this upcoming match due to stronger comprehensiveness in recent performance trends, yet Kumstat's capacity to perform in deciding sets should not be underestimated.